Skip to Content
Main content

CORDELLO AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

227

63%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

178

60%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

117

61%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

82

57%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

110

66%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

96

62%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

44

63%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

30

61%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

170

64%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

135

62%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

157

57%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

21

95%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

129

57%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

93

53%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

98

73%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

85

69%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

46

64%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

22

55%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

181

63%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

156

60%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.