Skip to Content
Main content

BAYPORT-BLUE POINT UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 915

LEVEL 1

118

13%

LEVEL 2

350

38%

LEVEL 3

310

34%

LEVEL 4

137

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

143

36%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

164

38%

LEVEL 3

153

35%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

71

37%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

235
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

186

39%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

408
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 828

LEVEL 1

100

12%

LEVEL 2

320

39%

LEVEL 3

282

34%

LEVEL 4

126

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

22

48%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

430
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

49

6%

LEVEL 2

298

38%

LEVEL 3

296

38%

LEVEL 4

134

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

138

41%

LEVEL 4

69

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

69

50%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

421
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 826

LEVEL 1

93

11%

LEVEL 2

312

38%

LEVEL 3

292

35%

LEVEL 4

129

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

25

28%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

14

24%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.