JOSEPH A EDGAR INTERMEDIATE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

136

28%

LEVEL 2

188

38%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

26

28%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

102

24%

LEVEL 2

162

39%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

26

48%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

86

20%

LEVEL 2

174

41%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

50

74%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

118

25%

LEVEL 2

185

39%

LEVEL 3

119

25%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

18

86%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

138

39%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.