Skip to Content
Main content

SOUND BEACH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

107

20%

LEVEL 2

175

33%

LEVEL 3

184

35%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

11

55%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

156

35%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

69

35%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

177

38%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

241
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

102

20%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

183

35%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

163

35%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.