ARROWHEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

79

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

37

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

39

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

25

42%

LEVEL 4

18

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

40

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

19

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

17

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

19

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

59

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

26

43%

LEVEL 4

16

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

78

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

36

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

24

44%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

76

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

34

37%

LEVEL 4

35

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.