Skip to Content
Main content

PARK AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

317

50%

LEVEL 2

210

33%

LEVEL 3

73

12%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

174

50%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

141

49%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

90

56%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

176

51%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

84

45%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

159

53%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

65

50%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

142

52%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

93

50%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

234

44%

LEVEL 2

203

38%

LEVEL 3

71

13%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

133

44%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

83

90%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

41

84%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

222

44%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

70

14%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

95

77%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

59

79%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

72

43%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

245

53%

LEVEL 2

157

34%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

144

52%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.