Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT MOSES MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

189

31%

LEVEL 2

270

44%

LEVEL 3

116

19%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

112

42%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

39

30%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

115

33%

LEVEL 2

158

45%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

56

36%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

119

45%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

33

34%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

68

40%

LEVEL 2

72

43%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

32

41%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

48

35%

LEVEL 2

58

42%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

39

48%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

104

20%

LEVEL 2

255

50%

LEVEL 3

112

22%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

85

81%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

176

29%

LEVEL 2

266

44%

LEVEL 3

116

19%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

157

44%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

43

26%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

105

40%

LEVEL 2

113

43%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

52

44%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.