Skip to Content
Main content

DUANESBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

117

44%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

20

83%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

116

41%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

32

44%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

27

40%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.