Skip to Content
Main content

CHANGO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

92

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

89

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

48

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

46

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

44

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

43

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

10

77%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

9

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

74

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

72

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

88

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

80

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

80

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.