Skip to Content
Main content

MASSENA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,105

LEVEL 1

393

36%

LEVEL 2

446

40%

LEVEL 3

198

18%

LEVEL 4

68

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

183

27%

LEVEL 2

253

38%

LEVEL 3

170

26%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

180

34%

LEVEL 2

224

42%

LEVEL 3

97

18%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

213

37%

LEVEL 2

222

39%

LEVEL 3

101

18%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

103

29%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

49

45%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

25

50%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

239
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 948

LEVEL 1

331

35%

LEVEL 2

378

40%

LEVEL 3

174

18%

LEVEL 4

65

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

167

28%

LEVEL 2

220

37%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 944

LEVEL 1

284

30%

LEVEL 2

406

43%

LEVEL 3

187

20%

LEVEL 4

67

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

114

20%

LEVEL 2

233

41%

LEVEL 3

165

29%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

109

68%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

69

73%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

104

23%

LEVEL 2

207

45%

LEVEL 3

99

21%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

289

45%

LEVEL 2

239

37%

LEVEL 3

99

15%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

146

37%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.