BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

155

33%

LEVEL 2

184

39%

LEVEL 3

90

19%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

135

32%

LEVEL 2

169

39%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

120

28%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

35

73%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

30

75%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

70

36%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.