Skip to Content
Main content

SCHODACK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

73

42%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

46

69%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

26

58%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

39

48%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

17

26%

LEVEL 2

29

45%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.