Skip to Content
Main content

CANANDAIGUA PRIMARY-ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

162

22%

LEVEL 2

270

36%

LEVEL 3

207

28%

LEVEL 4

112

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

134

22%

LEVEL 2

161

26%

LEVEL 3

175

28%

LEVEL 4

146

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

71

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

89

22%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

286
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 657

LEVEL 1

126

19%

LEVEL 2

245

37%

LEVEL 3

186

28%

LEVEL 4

100

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

287
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

108

20%

LEVEL 2

134

25%

LEVEL 3

152

29%

LEVEL 4

135

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

89

14%

LEVEL 2

252

39%

LEVEL 3

196

30%

LEVEL 4

110

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

76

14%

LEVEL 2

143

27%

LEVEL 3

167

31%

LEVEL 4

145

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

73

70%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

58

68%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

259
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

184

35%

LEVEL 3

161

31%

LEVEL 4

98

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

123

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.