Skip to Content
Main content

CAMILLUS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

185

44%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

132

45%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

100

49%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

74

48%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

167

44%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

169

46%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

120

46%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

35

66%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

145

44%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

35

40%

LEVEL 2

40

45%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

23

53%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.