NIAGARA STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

136

43%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

72

44%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

58

49%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

52

44%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

18

51%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

39

46%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

71

54%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

46

53%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

107

40%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

33

60%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

30

77%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

18

55%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

122

45%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

92

46%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.