Skip to Content
Main content

PS 50 FRANK HANKINSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

77

19%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

189

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

217

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

90

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

113

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

99

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

104

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

27

82%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

34

87%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

144

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

153

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

19

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

178

57%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

37

11%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

213

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

24

28%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

27

33%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

278
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

73

19%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

188

49%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

308
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

67

17%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

217

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

154

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

39

13%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

180

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

35

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

37

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.