Skip to Content
Main content

PS 32 GIFFORD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

91

22%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

20

45%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

82

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

77

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

67

61%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

55

56%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

199
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

84

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

169
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

83

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.