Skip to Content
Main content

BELLAIRE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

145

30%

LEVEL 2

140

29%

LEVEL 3

113

24%

LEVEL 4

82

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

121

28%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

91

21%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

63

28%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

58

27%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

111
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

92
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

46

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

58

39%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

57

41%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

37

47%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

96

23%

LEVEL 2

121

30%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

82

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

148

38%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

49

70%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

31

61%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

193
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

123

28%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

153
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

100

24%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.