Skip to Content
Main content

PS 176 CAMBRIA HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

72

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

53

34%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

144
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

164
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

71

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

30

73%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

163
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

85

25%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

72

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

184
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

19

21%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

29

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.