PS 90 HORACE MANN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

86

22%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

26

37%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

172
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

163
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

63

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

30

53%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

26

49%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

16

44%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.