PS 64 JOSEPH P ADDABBO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

121

37%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

84
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

97
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

40

36%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

50

45%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

64

23%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

20

57%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

24

52%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

132
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

32

62%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.