JAMES J AMBROSE SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

52

18%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

138

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

139

54%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

64

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

73

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

74

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

66

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

159
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

104

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

157
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

113

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

20

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

15

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

133

53%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

137

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

213
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

137

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

204
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

139

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

93

61%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

98

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

45

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

41

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.