Skip to Content
Main content

IS 61 LEONARDO DA VINCI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

503
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,347

LEVEL 1

895

38%

LEVEL 2

949

40%

LEVEL 3

377

16%

LEVEL 4

126

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

469
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,223

LEVEL 1

883

40%

LEVEL 2

871

39%

LEVEL 3

326

15%

LEVEL 4

143

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

253
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,112

LEVEL 1

404

36%

LEVEL 2

455

41%

LEVEL 3

190

17%

LEVEL 4

63

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

239
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,068

LEVEL 1

413

39%

LEVEL 2

416

39%

LEVEL 3

164

15%

LEVEL 4

75

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

250
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,235

LEVEL 1

491

40%

LEVEL 2

494

40%

LEVEL 3

187

15%

LEVEL 4

63

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

230
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,155

LEVEL 1

470

41%

LEVEL 2

455

39%

LEVEL 3

162

14%

LEVEL 4

68

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

132
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

70

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

92
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

52

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

31

35%

LEVEL 2

41

47%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

27

36%

LEVEL 2

37

49%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

340
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,997

LEVEL 1

817

41%

LEVEL 2

840

42%

LEVEL 3

290

15%

LEVEL 4

50

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

349
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,958

LEVEL 1

827

42%

LEVEL 2

782

40%

LEVEL 3

272

14%

LEVEL 4

77

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

488
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,972

LEVEL 1

632

32%

LEVEL 2

852

43%

LEVEL 3

363

18%

LEVEL 4

125

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

456
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,840

LEVEL 1

623

34%

LEVEL 2

761

41%

LEVEL 3

314

17%

LEVEL 4

142

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

263

70%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

14

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

260

68%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

12

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

471
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,667

LEVEL 1

450

27%

LEVEL 2

746

45%

LEVEL 3

350

21%

LEVEL 4

121

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

434
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,629

LEVEL 1

490

30%

LEVEL 2

705

43%

LEVEL 3

300

18%

LEVEL 4

134

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

445

65%

LEVEL 2

203

30%

LEVEL 3

27

4%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

393

66%

LEVEL 2

166

28%

LEVEL 3

26

4%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

29

32%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

474
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,256

LEVEL 1

866

38%

LEVEL 2

916

41%

LEVEL 3

358

16%

LEVEL 4

116

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

439
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,118

LEVEL 1

842

40%

LEVEL 2

837

40%

LEVEL 3

308

15%

LEVEL 4

131

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.