PS 327 DR ROSE B ENGLISH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

221

61%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

27

7%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

238

69%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

12

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

114

57%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

132

68%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

107

65%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

106

70%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

167

60%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

175

69%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

51

65%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

56

68%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

155

54%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

163

62%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

66

88%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

75

91%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

199

59%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

212

67%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

12

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

22

85%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

26

90%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

33

58%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

192

62%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

23

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

205

71%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.