Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

138

36%

LEVEL 2

155

41%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

178

44%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

74

37%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

92

46%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

106

39%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

125

45%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

22

32%

LEVEL 2

33

48%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

137

42%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

32

58%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

45

67%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

111

32%

LEVEL 2

150

43%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

76
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

151

42%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

27

64%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

51

40%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

127

46%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.