PS 90 EDNA COHEN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

83

32%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

83

32%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

51

36%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

32

28%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

24

45%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

52

38%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

51

35%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

23

61%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

73

30%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

22

29%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.