Skip to Content
Main content

PS 192 MAGNET SCHOOL-MATH AND SCI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

101

29%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

114

33%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

22

26%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

28

49%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

47

60%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

55

71%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

54

57%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

52

63%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

90

37%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.