Skip to Content
Main content

PS 214 MICHAEL FRIEDSAM GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

143

32%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

153

37%

LEVEL 2

134

32%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

78

36%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

116
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

102
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

30

46%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

26

46%

LEVEL 2

21

37%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

67

47%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

75

57%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

117

33%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

33

49%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

89

22%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

129
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

28

57%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

45

78%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

42

35%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.