Skip to Content
Main content

PS 211 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

208

56%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

181

50%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

106

56%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

88

47%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

102

55%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

93

53%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

180

54%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

34

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

153

48%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

148

49%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

131

43%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

60

83%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

50

82%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

123

51%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

85

63%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

79

61%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

203

56%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

175

51%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.