Skip to Content
Main content

MS 129 ACAD-INDEPENDENT LEARNING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

202

44%

LEVEL 2

177

39%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

246

50%

LEVEL 2

169

34%

LEVEL 3

63

13%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

96

42%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

117

50%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

106

46%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

129

51%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

71

48%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

91

57%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

127

43%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

149

48%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

128

36%

LEVEL 2

148

42%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

166

44%

LEVEL 2

141

37%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

74

72%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

80

71%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

147

38%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

176

45%

LEVEL 2

144

37%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

55

71%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

70

69%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

30

55%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

197

44%

LEVEL 2

174

39%

LEVEL 3

58

13%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

216

50%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

55

13%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.