Skip to Content
Main content

PS 67 MOHEGAN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

162

52%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

136

49%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

80

51%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

66

48%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

82

53%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

70

49%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

41

52%

LEVEL 2

32

41%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

117

51%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

100

48%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

126

48%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

104

47%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

36

68%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

32

55%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

136

49%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

123

47%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

26

72%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

26

50%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

110

48%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.