Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 280 MOSHOLU PARKWAY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

194

34%

LEVEL 2

212

37%

LEVEL 3

125

22%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

164

28%

LEVEL 2

225

39%

LEVEL 3

140

24%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

99

36%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

88

30%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

95

31%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

22

35%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

20

36%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

148

37%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

132
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

127

30%

LEVEL 2

169

39%

LEVEL 3

97

23%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

103

23%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

75

17%

LEVEL 2

177

41%

LEVEL 3

124

29%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

91

65%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

89

57%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

132

27%

LEVEL 2

195

39%

LEVEL 3

123

25%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

190
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

115

23%

LEVEL 2

201

40%

LEVEL 3

135

27%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

62

76%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

49

63%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

188

35%

LEVEL 2

195

36%

LEVEL 3

116

21%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

161

29%

LEVEL 2

213

38%

LEVEL 3

131

24%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.