Skip to Content
Main content

HAROLD O LEVY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

250

48%

LEVEL 2

214

41%

LEVEL 3

57

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

248

52%

LEVEL 2

182

38%

LEVEL 3

37

8%

LEVEL 4

7

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

128

48%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

116

50%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

122

48%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

132

55%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

235

47%

LEVEL 2

208

42%

LEVEL 3

52

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

234

52%

LEVEL 2

170

38%

LEVEL 3

35

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

197

43%

LEVEL 2

200

44%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

202

49%

LEVEL 2

164

40%

LEVEL 3

36

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

53

76%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

134

38%

LEVEL 2

167

47%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

152

46%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

116

69%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

115

78%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

15

42%

LEVEL 2

18

50%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

44

52%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

235

48%

LEVEL 2

196

40%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

204

52%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.