Skip to Content
Main content

PS 108 ASSEMBLYMAN ANGELO DEL TORO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

202

43%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

63

13%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

194

45%

LEVEL 2

174

41%

LEVEL 3

49

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

108

44%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

103

45%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

80

40%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

11

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

55

44%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

54

46%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

141

46%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

131

47%

LEVEL 2

120

43%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

128

34%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

147

43%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

74

79%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

62

69%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

166

40%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

59

14%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

157

42%

LEVEL 2

159

42%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

36

62%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

37

69%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

157

47%

LEVEL 2

137

41%

LEVEL 3

34

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.