Skip to Content
Main content

PS 180 HUGO NEWMAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

96

33%

LEVEL 2

123

42%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

112

35%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

75

48%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

58

37%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

72

43%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

69

34%

LEVEL 2

87

42%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

110

43%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

81

29%

LEVEL 2

120

43%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

31

67%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

101

33%

LEVEL 2

131

43%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

102

44%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

97

39%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.