Skip to Content
Main content

PS 87 WILLIAM SHERMAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

67

15%

LEVEL 3

135

31%

LEVEL 4

213

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

207

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

98

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

98

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

115

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

109

57%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

22

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

21

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

258
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

163

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

37

14%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

153

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

14

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

18

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

50

14%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

191

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

48

14%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

190

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

44
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

23

37%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

346
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

65

15%

LEVEL 3

135

32%

LEVEL 4

211

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

316
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

66

17%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

207

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

323
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

58

15%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

202

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

295
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

56

16%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

198

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.