Skip to Content
Main content

EXPLORE CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

70

39%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

79

45%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

169
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

101
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

80

27%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

74

25%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

21

37%

LEVEL 2

25

44%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.