Skip to Content
Main content

E M BAKER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

126

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

43

15%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

133

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

24

16%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

56

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

63

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

70

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

70

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

88
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

68

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

102
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

76

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

64

39%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

50

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

37

14%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

125

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

34

14%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

132

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

125

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

204
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

40

15%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

128

48%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

33

13%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

119

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

124

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.