Skip to Content
Main content

WILLETS ROAD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

75

20%

LEVEL 3

141

38%

LEVEL 4

133

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

50

15%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

141

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

40

22%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

62

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

69

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

72

37%

LEVEL 4

71

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

70

40%

LEVEL 4

72

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

50

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

84
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

57

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

77

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

84

40%

LEVEL 4

77

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

61

19%

LEVEL 3

130

40%

LEVEL 4

133

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

37

12%

LEVEL 3

120

40%

LEVEL 4

140

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

260
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

120

37%

LEVEL 4

140

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

137

38%

LEVEL 4

133

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

253
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

136

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.