GARDEN CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

477
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

20

3%

LEVEL 2

152

23%

LEVEL 3

237

37%

LEVEL 4

240

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

140

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

217
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

110

37%

LEVEL 4

107

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

61

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

133

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

79

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

12

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

445
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

141

23%

LEVEL 3

221

37%

LEVEL 4

224

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

119

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

125

21%

LEVEL 3

223

38%

LEVEL 4

238

40%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

116

36%

LEVEL 4

139

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

27

47%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

22

67%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

472
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

19

3%

LEVEL 2

148

23%

LEVEL 3

232

36%

LEVEL 4

240

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

140

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.