Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 9M-OCEANSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

67

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

44

42%

LEVEL 4

30

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

53

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

21

42%

LEVEL 2

23

46%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

113

37%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

90

39%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

38

76%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

85

41%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.