Skip to Content
Main content

DAVID PATERSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

137

53%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

51

43%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

68

50%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

59

52%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

69

56%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

45

51%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

55

60%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

63

49%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

74

51%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

96

45%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

123

51%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

73

40%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

83

43%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

54

78%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

94

46%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

125

54%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.