Skip to Content
Main content

MARIE CURIE INST OF ENGIN AND COMM GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

123

53%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

93

53%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

54

50%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

40

53%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

69

55%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

53

53%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

29

38%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

79

66%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

55

66%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

109

51%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

80

51%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

81

51%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

101

58%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.