Skip to Content
Main content

ATTICA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

144

25%

LEVEL 2

240

41%

LEVEL 3

152

26%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

122

25%

LEVEL 2

203

41%

LEVEL 3

116

24%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

134

42%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

104

42%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

135

24%

LEVEL 2

235

42%

LEVEL 3

148

27%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

196

42%

LEVEL 3

111

24%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

216

43%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

183

44%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

51

63%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

46

64%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

81

37%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

84

44%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.