Skip to Content
Main content

GLOVERSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

255

42%

LEVEL 2

272

45%

LEVEL 3

66

11%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

127

48%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

129

43%

LEVEL 2

134

45%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

60

48%

LEVEL 2

56

45%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

126

41%

LEVEL 2

138

45%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

67

48%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

221

41%

LEVEL 2

244

46%

LEVEL 3

58

11%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

111

48%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

152

32%

LEVEL 2

244

52%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

99

53%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

103

78%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

70

92%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

79

51%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

34

50%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

211

47%

LEVEL 2

193

43%

LEVEL 3

41

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

104

53%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.