LACKAWANNA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

298

54%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

69

12%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

171

49%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

126

51%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

72

49%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

172

55%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

99

49%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

185

49%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

63

68%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

47

60%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

22

55%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

179

43%

LEVEL 2

148

36%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

108

39%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

119

83%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

63

83%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

223

48%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

116

42%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

75

82%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

55

74%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

281

57%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

156

50%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.