Skip to Content
Main content

FREDERICK OLMSTED #156 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

81

22%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

67

38%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

47

28%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

13

59%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

53

42%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

58
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

18

36%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

25

51%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

123

41%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

119

43%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

45

64%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

45

64%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

151
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

135
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

137

41%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

88

43%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

75

45%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.