Skip to Content
Main content

NATIVE AMERICAN MAGNET GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

186

57%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

185

58%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

91

54%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

92

58%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

95

60%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

93

58%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

21

43%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

40

48%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

44

51%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

85

68%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

91

72%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

27

66%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

149

55%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

149

55%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

37

66%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

36

71%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

109

50%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

100

48%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

77

73%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

85

77%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

41

73%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

145

54%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

163

57%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.