CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

94

15%

LEVEL 2

252

39%

LEVEL 3

195

30%

LEVEL 4

106

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

93

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

69

39%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

55

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

25

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

217

42%

LEVEL 3

155

30%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

59

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

52

9%

LEVEL 2

213

38%

LEVEL 3

190

34%

LEVEL 4

105

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

93

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

42

48%

LEVEL 2

39

45%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

279
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

199

37%

LEVEL 3

176

33%

LEVEL 4

103

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

121

37%

LEVEL 4

90

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

53

50%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.