Skip to Content
Main content

KINRY ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

23

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

9

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

13

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

53

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

17

47%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

23

53%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

34

51%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.